So, as the title of the post would suggest, I have completely rewritten my post. The original was poorly written; and as I have been profoundly bored as of late, I have pondered the question some and come up with a more personally engineered response. So voila, ici: my new post.
While it is aggravating to note how much the British Colombian government has cut back on our school's budgets as of late, one has to wonder whether it may be deserved. The government provides our schools with funding for a reason: that they may provide all students in the province with an appropriate education. If we are to define an "appropriate education" as an education which stimulates every child in a class at least 80% of the time, as well as preparing each child for their future (providing them with the knowledge they will need to keep themselves healthy in mind, body and spirit), we can safely conclude that our schools are not making appropriate use of government funding. If this is the case, should the government really be providing the schools with large amounts of money? Many of the programs our schools run are redundant. Our PE classes (sorry Ms Barley), could use an updated curriculum. Cooking and art classes have relatively little value, and many of the language courses are biased towards people who already have a background in the language. Add to the outdated curriculum the lack of interesting course material and we have a slight problem on our hands. In the end, the question comes to: Are schools making appropriate use of government funding? Clearly the government concluded that our schools weren't being practical. It isn't schadenfreude if there's a method to the madness, and we have no right to complain about fair decisions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete"...on their hands then politically active and aware youth..." shouldnt it be "than" instead of "then"?
ReplyDeleteWell, I agree that the government has certain desires to control its voters such that this government can stay in power. But critism from the media and political satires are major threats if they do. After all, uneducated people will believe more in the funny cartoons than long and boring speeches.
Touche, but the media in our province and country is by and large liberally biased; therefore they are liable to have funny cartoons in their own favor and shall manage to keep the people under their sway so long as we are uneducated.
ReplyDeleteAnd oh yes, thanks for the edit note. :)
when did you become so nice?
ReplyDeleteNot nice. Bored and effectively lonely. I also have read large amounts of Voltaire and Rousseau over the break and this has made for the temporary sweetening of my disposition. ...I also read a lot of Wodehouse, but somehow this has not made quite the same impact on my mood. ...Anarchy must be losing its magnetism.
ReplyDeleteYou know I said it before and I'll say it again!!!! We Need Teens in the Goverment, we need to stand up!!! And take control of the world!!!! Evil lol
ReplyDeleteI have read the works of Confucius, Mencius, Han Feizi, Gui Guzi,Li Si and Su Qin. None of them wanted a political system with the abscence of law,order, and stability.
ReplyDeleteWhere did that come from?
ReplyDeleteThat is why they are dead and forgotten by the present day school systems in china. Good Friday!
ReplyDeleteby the way...Steven...spelling error...absence not abscence.
ReplyDeletethis one is even worse...I dont even want to read it...
ReplyDeleteIn short, it is not clear(the first 8 lines)
ReplyDeleteWhy thank you Jisong for your considerate comments. In short, the only good thing about them is that they are short.
ReplyDeleteHey, F for fantastic!
ReplyDelete